Fewer than one in 30 teachers and leaders say their school uses suspensions excessively, despite fresh government pressure on leaders to keep more pupils in school. Last week the Department for Education (DfE) pledged a new framework for 鈥渋nternal suspensions鈥 鈥 often called internal exclusions or isolation 鈥 as part of its looming white paper. Guidance will encourage schools to send fewer pupils home, limiting off-site suspensions to 鈥渢he most serious and violent behaviour鈥. But the announcement prompted warnings of greater disruption in schools, and confusion over what the government wants 鈥 as suspended pupils cannot currently be kept in school. While suspensions have increased by a fifth in recent years, just one per cent of 5,020 teachers polled recently by said schools use off-site suspensions too much. Heads were slightly more likely to say the same (three per cent). Far more (31 per cent) said schools use too few, though the biggest proportion (41 per cent) said schools use the right amount. Data also revealed many teachers鈥 schools already used internal exclusions. Of those, 34 per cent said schools used the right amount. Another 23 per cent said they were used too little. ‘Short sighted approach’ Mike Cater, CEO of Character Education Trust, said it 鈥渇elt like a complex situation has been met with quite a short-sighted approach鈥 in the new guidance. 鈥淚t鈥檚 so incredibly complex and individual to each school and headteachers鈥ut this does seem to be just a way of putting off headteachers from making that decision when they have to make it. No-one makes that lightly.鈥 Last week鈥檚 announcement was marred by communications blunders, with actual guidance not due for weeks. Pepe Di鈥橧asio, general secretary of school leaders鈥 union ASCL, agreed it was 鈥減oorly handled and lacked detail鈥. Pepe DiIasio 鈥淎s this data shows, many schools already use on-site suspensions鈥hat schools really need is investment that allows them to employ appropriately skilled specialist staff and ensure the right support is in place to prevent behavioural issues from escalating.鈥 Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders鈥 union NAHT, highlighted potential 鈥減ractical barriers鈥 to using more internal exclusion, such as having enough space or staff. Schools are not expected to receive extra funding to support more excluded pupils on site. Neil Miller, deputy CEO of London South East Academies Trust, said his schools had suspended pupils involved in social media bullying, and for repeated discriminatory language. 鈥淚t isn鈥檛 about those percentages and numbers. This is about doing the right thing for the right child for the right time.鈥 Calls for ministers to trust schools Persistent disruptive behaviour was the top reason for suspension last year, followed by verbal or physical abuse towards staff. 鈥淲e’re not recruiting enough teachers in this country as it is,鈥 Miller added. Neil Miller 鈥淚f they鈥檙e being physically threatened or verbally threatened by children, and actually those children are still coming into the school鈥hat message are we giving out to those staff?鈥 The DfE has insisted headteachers will retain autonomy over both suspensions and internal exclusions. Caroline Lowing, headteacher of Thornden School in Hampshire, said there should be 鈥渢rust in what we鈥檙e doing鈥. While her school may suspend pupils for swearing at teachers, this 鈥渨ill be different 20 miles down the road鈥. Miller agreed guidance 鈥渃an鈥檛 be a one size fits all鈥, warning that otherwise significant numbers of schools would be 鈥渞eally penalised鈥. Despite leaders鈥 concerns, Philip Wood, principal associate at law firm Browne Jacobson, said he did not expect guidance to 鈥減articularly move the dial鈥, with schools already using internal suspensions. 鈥淲e advise a significant number of headteachers on a daily basis – I鈥檓 not sure headteachers are giving suspensions without thinking about it.鈥 DfE weighs data requests but not targets Schools are not currently required legally to record data on internal exclusions, but many do so through management information systems (MIS). Schools Week revealed earlier this week the DfE will 鈥渟eek views on the appropriate requirements for recording and reporting鈥 internal exclusions. Ane Vernon, partner at law firm Payne Hicks Beach, said this would take isolation room usage 鈥渙ut of the dark murky corners of some practices鈥. The government confirmed schools won鈥檛 face targets on internal exclusion, however. Schools Week also recently revealed the widespread use of internal exclusions for the first time, using data from MIS provider Arbor. Our investigation found the average secondary school using the practice isolates almost a fifth of pupils from their classmates at least once each year. The DfE was approached for comment.
Pat Hanlon 7 February 2026 Elective home education (EHE) has increased significantly in Suffolk over the last five years, with nearly 600 more children registered in 2024 compared to pre-pandemic levels in 2019. Data indicates a steady rise, with figures growing from 1,383 in August 2019 to 1,975 in 2023, according to East Anglian Daily Times , concerns over school support for SEND or mental health needs. school exclusions and suspensions have also increased significantly in Suffolk over the last 5 years, with recent data (2023-2025) highlighting a “crisis” with record numbers of suspensions, most of which are students with neurodiversity issues.