The government response to the education committee’s grammar schools report is out – editor Laura McInerney gives it the speed-read treatment. Over the 2016/17 academic year, the schools community was subject to a consultation on bringing back new grammar schools. In response, the parliamentary education committee investigated and published a series of recommendations. Today, the government – by way of schools minister Nick Gibb – has to these recommendations. Note: it still hasn’t published its response to the consultation, which is now almost a year late. Here, in brief and with all the jargon taken out, is what it says along with my comments: Recommendations 1 & 2: Show how grammar schools help the Industrial strategy and how they will close the attainment gap Nick Gibb response: We expect everyone to teach the EBacc and also the education secretary will lay out the Industrial Strategy My view: Seriously, this is what it says. Recommendation 3: Government must be cautious when comparing between high- and mixed-ability pupils at selective and non-selective schools Nick Gibb response: We agree and the head of statistics has put in place procedures to ensure this happens. My view: Not surprising given they were told off by the Statistics Authority. Recommendation 4: Tests should not be the only basis for grammar school admission Nick Gibb response: We expect selective schools to reduce the impact of tutoring for tests and create free of charge mock tests and familiarisation programmes for everyone, but particularly children from disadvantaged My view: This translates into ‘No, we are not going to make any change to grammar admissions’. Recommendation 5: The Government must publish a thorough assessment of the impact of introducing greater selection on the wider school system, outlining all of the options considered Nick Gibb response: We are doing lots of things that are impacting the wider system such as reviewing teacher recruitment and bringing in the national funding formula. My view: It’s amazing how the 300 word answer to this question never once mentions selection, selective schools or grammars WHICH IS WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT. — And that’s it! Maybe this is because the Department for Education is no longer spending any resource on looking into grammar school expansion. But one can never be too careful…
4 December 2017 Just reminds us all of the classic conundrums about polishing turds and applying lipstick to a pig. I wonder why Gibb sticks at his post….?