Government reforms to music hubs have sent organisations scrambling to exit the teachers’ pension scheme, put some areas’ provision at “enormous risk” and put staff through the “most torrid times of their career”, MPs heard today. Music hub leaders and experts gave evidence to the Parliamentary education committee following the government’s decision to slash the number of hubs from 116 to 43. The government set up music hubs in 2012 to take over the music education provision previously run by local authorities. But the DfE announced plans in 2022 to re-tender hub contracts to a smaller number of lead organisations to provide economies of scale and more opportunities for training and development. Here’s what we learned. 1. Arts Council ‘bit off more than they could chew’ Severn Arts currently runs a music hub, and has won a contract to run a larger one from September. But its chair John de la Cour warned the implementation of the programme was 鈥渁cting against its own ambition because it takes too long鈥. He said he felt staff at the Arts Council, and ran the tender process, were 鈥渂iting off more than they could chew鈥. 鈥淭he whole thing was being thrown up in the air, and you don鈥檛 do that if you aren鈥檛 extremely clear about what benefit you think you want to get from this. And that has never been clear to anybody I don鈥檛 think.鈥 He said the government鈥檚 plan had 鈥渧ery wide ambitions but a funding programme behind it which is completely unable to meet those expectations鈥. Staff up and down the country 鈥渉ave worked enormous hours meeting ridiculous deadlines, having to plough through enormous amounts of paperwork鈥. 鈥淢any experienced managers have told me that the last 18 months have been the most torrid times of their entire arts career.鈥 2. Hubs scramble to leave pension scheme Hubs directly employ musical instrument teachers. Teaching staff in hubs that are run by councils have to be in the teachers’ pension scheme by law, but many staff in hubs run by charities are also in the TPS. Employer contributions rose by more than 20 per cent last month from 23.6 to 28.6 per cent, and the DfE has been providing top-up funding towards the rise. Damian Hinds But although music hubs that are run by councils will continue to receive the funding from September, those run by other organisations like charities are due to lose their funding in August. The decision will have 鈥渆normous human and financial consequences鈥, said de la Cour. Severn is now consulting on whether to leave the teachers鈥 pension scheme 鈥渢o protect the company鈥 from an estimated 鈥溌300,000 hit鈥. Schools minister Damian Hinds told the committee the DfE was 鈥済oing to be doing some work to understand [the impact] more fully鈥. But he said 鈥測ou should not infer from that that we鈥檙e necessarily going to do something different鈥. But Chris Walters, from the Musician鈥檚 Union, said 鈥渃onsultations to exit from the TPS are happening now. So we鈥檙e really up against it timewise鈥. Walters says between three and four hubs were 鈥渨ell on the way to finishing their consultations鈥. Around 1,100 teachers across England are understood to be affected. 3. Snubbed provision 鈥榓t enormous risk鈥 The deadline for bids to lead new hubs was last September, but the winners were announced this month. It leaves unsuccessful hubs scrambling to form partnerships to deliver provision in just five months. Andrew Lane, managing director of Dynamics Medway, which lost out to Kent Music, said music hub activity in his area was now at 鈥渆normous risk鈥. His organisation has only received a request for 鈥渄ata, financial and operational information鈥 from the new hub lead, but 鈥渘o indication at all that they鈥檙e actually seeking to work in any partnership鈥 from September this year. Lane called for a 鈥渘ational pause鈥, or at least a one-year postponement of transition in areas where there had been contested bids. He said six areas faced 鈥渟imilar challenges鈥 to Medway. Jenny Oldroyd, the DfE鈥檚 director for curriculum and qualifications, said it would 鈥渢ake time for those partnerships to reach maturity鈥. 鈥淚 wouldn鈥檛 at all expect us to be in a place of formed partnerships and clarity for the future two weeks into this five-month process.鈥 4. Stagnant funding means real-term cuts Michael Summers, from Durham Music Service, said government funding for hubs was 鈥渧ery welcome鈥 but 鈥渘ot enough鈥. The amount put in by government – 拢79 million 鈥 is almost exactly the same is when the hubs launched in 2012. His hub has lost around 拢1.1 million in real terms, and has had to reduce staffing. Bridget Whyte, from the charity Music Mark, said her organisation lobbied the government to increase funding for hubs to 拢100 million in 2019. There are 500,000 more children in schools now than 10 years ago, and 鈥渋nflationary increase for the grant in 2012 would be 拢103.2 million鈥. 5. 拢25m capital cash can鈥檛 fund repairs The government is providing 拢25 million in capital cash for instruments and equipment, but funding rules mean it can鈥檛 be spent on maintenance and repair. Summers added that they could also only buy secondhand equipment from providers listed via a portal, preventing him from buying cheap instruments on eBay or Facebook Marketplace. 鈥淚t feels very unsustainable and it feels like a couple of large instrument providers will make a large amount of money from this.鈥 6. Hinds mulls 鈥榩erformance鈥 measures for hubs Hinds said the government was looking at developing performance measures for hubs. These would be 鈥渁ppropriate measures like the amount of teaching time that there is for music, in the early years how many children are reaching an early learning goal for musical expression, obviously the number of children who enter qualifications of one sort or another鈥. But Stuart Darke, from the Independent Society of Musicians, said he feared some hubs were being 鈥渟et up to fail鈥 because the government鈥檚 music plan is non-statutory and schools don鈥檛 have to engage with hubs. 鈥淗ow are they going to increase engagement when schools don鈥檛 have to?鈥