More than 100 organisations have urged the new government to ditch the Conservatives’ draft relationships and sex education (RSHE) guidance, which they warn 鈥渇alls short of what is required to help keep children safe, healthy and prepared for modern life鈥�. Organisations working across education, safeguarding, child sexual abuse, violence against women and girls, mental health, online safety and LGBT+ inclusion This could limit the 鈥減revention of harm in relation to issues including sexual health, violence against women and girls, mental health, safeguarding from sexual abuse, inclusion and tackling current and emerging threats like online misogyny鈥�. The Conservative government launched a consultation in May on planned updates to guidance first issued in 2019, following a review of the reforms. Calls for ‘fresh start’ to RSHE review It proposed age limits on 鈥渟ensitive鈥� topics, ordered schools not to teach about 鈥済ender identity鈥� and to share materials with parents. Lucy Emmerson Ministers were accused at the time of stirring up 鈥渃ulture war鈥� issues in the run-up to the election. The consultation closes today. To coincide with its closure, more than 100 organisations including the ASCL and NAHT leaders’ unions, the PSHE Association, Sex Education Forum, Barnardo’s, Refuge and Everyone’s Invited have issued a joint statement calling for a 鈥渇resh start鈥� to the review. 鈥淲e are calling on the next government to discard the draft guidance and begin this process in due course, focusing on the needs of children and young people and supporting teachers to deliver a high-quality, inclusive curriculum.鈥� Lucy Emmerson, CEO of the Sex Education Forum, said age restrictions would be a 鈥渂ackward step making children more vulnerable to abuse and harm鈥�. PSHE association chief executive Jonathan Baggaley, warned he had 鈥渄eep concerns about the development process and shortcomings of the draft guidance, particularly on critical aspects of children鈥檚 safeguarding, wellbeing and inclusion鈥�. And Lynn Perry, chief executive of 叠补谤苍补谤诲辞鈥檚, said introducing age limits to RSHE topics 鈥渞isks children missing out on crucial teaching about abuse and exploitation鈥�. Scope and timing of consultation ‘problematic’ In the statement, shared exclusively with Schools Week, the signatories said RSHE 鈥渉elps to protect children and young people from harm, keep them healthy and prepare them for life鈥檚 challenges and opportunities鈥�. Current guidance, in force since 2020, is based on 鈥渞obust evidence, informed by a rigorous engagement process and a twelve-week consultation鈥�. They warned the 鈥渓imited scope and structure鈥� of the recent review, and 鈥渞educed eight-week consultation, is also problematic, as is the general election falling during this consultation period鈥�. Paul Whiteman This removed the 鈥渙pportunity for planned Department for Education stakeholder engagement鈥�. Pepe Di鈥橧asio, from ASCL, said government should 鈥渞edraft the consultation鈥chool and family relationships need strengthening rather than undermining鈥�. Paul Whiteman, of the NAHT, said the draft guidance was 鈥渦nworkable, out of touch with the realities of what children and young people are experiencing in their lives, and undermines best practice in terms of both safeguarding and pedagogy鈥�. “The new government must scrap it and begin a fresh review with proper collaboration.鈥� The full statement Relationships, sex and health education (RSHE) helps to protect children and young people from harm, keep them healthy and prepare them for life鈥檚 challenges and opportunities. The current statutory guidance for RSHE in England 鈥� in force since 2020 鈥� is based on robust evidence, informed by a rigorous engagement process and a twelve-week consultation. It had support and input from safeguarding bodies, national children鈥檚 charities, specialist violence against women and girls organisations, faith and belief groups, parents and carers, teachers, teaching and leadership unions and young people, and votes of support from 538 MPs from across the political spectrum. The current guidance provides the foundation on which schools have improved teaching of high quality, age-appropriate RSHE since 2020, despite Covid disruption. Any review of RSHE must build on this progress and focus on responding to the needs and experiences of those the guidance will support: children and young people, teachers and schools. ‘Falls short’ We are concerned that the draft new RSHE guidance out for consultation until 11 July falls short of what is required to help keep children safe, healthy and prepared for modern life. Age restrictions and topic bans pose a threat to the preventative role of RSHE, limiting the prevention of harm in relation to issues including sexual health, violence against women and girls (VAWG), mental health, safeguarding from sexual abuse, inclusion and tackling current and emerging threats like online misogyny. The limited scope and structure of the review, and reduced eight-week consultation, is also problematic, as is the general election falling during this consultation period (thereby removing the opportunity for planned Department for Education stakeholder engagement). A fresh start and a new review is needed. We are calling on the next government to discard the draft guidance and begin this process in due course, focusing on the needs of children and young people and supporting teachers to deliver a high-quality, inclusive curriculum. ‘Future updates to RSHE must be…’ Evidence based: using the best available evidence of what works in preventative education and the needs and experiences of all children and young people, so that it is effective, relevant, up-to-date and age and developmentally-appropriate. Transparent: any evidence and recommendations that inform new proposals should be published, as should any evaluations of RSHE under current guidance. Representative: there should be ongoing engagement with a wide range of stakeholders, including parents and carers, children and young people, teachers and teaching and leadership unions, national safeguarding bodies, children鈥檚 charities and specialist VAWG organisations, academics and experts. The signatories Safeguarding, child protection and rights 叠补谤苍补谤诲辞鈥檚 NSPCC Girlguiding UK Amnesty International UK Centre of expertise on child sexual abuse (CSA Centre) Lucy Faithfull Foundation Plan International UK Catch22 Education and Unions ASCL NAHT National Education Union PSHE Association HMC BSA Group (Boarding Schools’ Association) Coram University of Birmingham, School of Social Policy and Society Big Talk Education Human Values Foundation Jigsaw Education Group Training Works Chameleon PDE Ltd Wickersley Partnership Trust PSHE Service Cambs Violence against women and girls The End Violence Against Women Coalition Refuge Women’s Aid Federation of England (Women’s Aid) Rape Crisis England & Wales Everyone’s Invited Action Breaks Silence Advance Birmingham and Solihull Women’s Aid Bold Voices Beyond Equality FORWARD Imkaan IKWRO – Women’s Rights Organisation IRISi Jewish Women’s Aid Juno Women’s Aid Kindling Transformative Interventions Latin American Women’s Aid Latin American Women’s Rights Service (LAWRS) LMK Let Me Know Middle Eastern Women and Society Organisation (MEWSO) Our Streets Now Rights of Women Solace Women’s Aid Surviving Economic Abuse Survivors Of Abuse Tender This Ends Now Violence Against Women and Girls Research Network Woman’s Trust Women’s Budget Group Roj Women’s Association White ribbon UK Agenda Alliance Standing Together Respect Savana Mental health, physical health, and sexual & reproductive health Anna Freud AYPH Mencap Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Terrence Higgins Trust British Association for Sexual Health and HIV Brook Family Planning Association Teenage Pregnancy Knowledge Exchange, University of Bedfordshire The Centre for Emotional Health Doctors for Choice UK Dorset Healthcare Sexual Health Islington Council Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust Reproductive Justice Initiative The Eve Appeal The Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Turning Point Worcestershire Integrated Sexual Health part of Herefordshire & Worcestershire Health & Care Trust Young Person’s Advisory Service Croydon Youth Information & Counselling Service Ltd Internet Safety Childnet Internet Matters Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) Parent Zone SWGfL RSE and Inclusion Sex Education Forum Stonewall DEAFAX Engendering Change Ltd Fumble It Happens Education Limited Life Lessons Life Support Productions Lifting Limits Loudmouth Education and Training Make it Mandatory Period Positive Race Equality Foundation School of Sexuality Education Sexpression:UK Split Banana The Schools Consent Project TransActual The Story Project Faith and Belief Humanists UK Methodist Church in Britain thirtyone:eight