Schools minister Damian Hinds has admitted he was “wrong” to reduce bursaries for maths teachers in favour of “golden handcuff” payments in their early careers when he was education secretary. The minister, re-appointed to the department last month to replace Nick Gibb, also revealed today he is planning changes to the early career framework from 2025. Hinds appeared alongside senior DfE official Sue Lovelock in front of the education committee this morning. Here’s what we learned… 1. ‘I was wrong on golden handcuffs’ A recent government report concluded that a 2018 pilot that reduced an initial bursary for maths teachers in favour of retention payments in their early careers likely results in a net loss of almost 200 entrants to the profession. This was enacted during Hinds鈥檚 time as education secretary. He told MPs today that so-called 鈥済olden handcuffs鈥 were 鈥渟omething I was in a previous time at DfE particularly keen on. And I turned out to be wrong.鈥 He said he had 鈥渁ssumed鈥 a higher payment overall but with some of the payments spread over the early years of a teacher鈥檚 career 鈥渨ould mean we would end up with a better overall result, and we didn鈥檛 actually鈥. However, he said he was 鈥渟till not opposed to the principle鈥 of golden handcuffs, which are a feature in the newer early career payments and levelling-up premium policies. 2. Hinds plans ECF changes from 2025 Changes to the early career framework to address concerns about the new induction period for new teachers will come into effect in 2025, Hinds revealed today. However, aside from some work to address 鈥渄uplication鈥 between content of the ECF and what teachers learn during their training, no specific changes were outlined at today’s hearing. Hinds was responding to concerns that participants and their mentors are struggling to balance the time off timetable with their workload. The minister said if there was a 鈥渕ismatch in how much time the professional development is taking relative to that extra time then of course we need to address that鈥. Lovelock said the DfE was 鈥渁t the moment鈥 looking to 鈥渟trip out duplication鈥. 鈥淲e鈥檝e had clear feedback that there is a bit of repetition we need to strip out so that鈥檚 something we鈥檙e actively doing in light of feedback at the moment.鈥 Pressed on timing, Hinds said: 鈥淲e鈥檙e looking from 2025 to make any changes.鈥 The DfE has already said it wants the ECF and the core content framework of what is taught in ITT to be 鈥渕ore closely combined鈥. DfE deputy director Chris Armstrong-Stacey told the NASBTT conference last month the department was working on moving to a “single framework that combines the old ECF and CCF”. 3. ‘Trailblazers’ working on non-grad apprenticeship route Plans for an apprenticeship route into teaching for non-graduates are now being worked up by a government 鈥渢railblazer group鈥. The DfE revealed earlier this year it was developing a teaching degree apprenticeship, after several false starts for the policy since 2017. Lovelock said the DfE 鈥渢hink it鈥檚 got lots of potential to offer a new route into the teaching profession for candidates that don鈥檛 yet have a degree and would like to earn and learn their way through to becoming a professional teacher鈥. The route is 鈥渧ery much at the development stage鈥, with a trailblazer group from the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education now developing the 鈥渒nowledge, skills and behaviours needed鈥. They will then 鈥渁gree and approve the standard that will then be used by providers to develop those courses and then start to recruit potential candidates鈥. The Sunday Times reported over the weekend that Teach First was keen to provide degree apprenticeships once the route is created. Lovelock said the National Institute of Teaching was also interested. 4. New ‘refined’ workload toolkit coming The DfE published a school workload reduction toolkit in 2018. But recent data from Teacher Tapp found around a third of senior leaders hadn鈥檛 even heard of it, another third had not read it and 23 per cent had read it but did not find it useful. Only 9 per cent reported finding it useful. Hinds told MPs the document had been downloaded 30,000 times 鈥渟o it鈥檚 not a trivial number. I鈥檇 like it to be more鈥. He also acknowledged that 鈥渢rying to get people to do another thing, which is to download [the toolkit]鈥hat is itself an extra task you鈥檙e asking people to take on. But we think there鈥檚 a lot of value to it鈥. He added that the toolkit was 鈥渘ot perfect. And it is going to be refined into a better, digital, slicker and therefore quicker to use version.鈥 Ministers have pledged to reduce teachers鈥 average working weeks by five hours, and Hinds said to do this 鈥渨e are going to need to address planning and prep and marking and data. There are all these things which are taking time鈥. 5. No date yet to complete strategy ‘refresh’ A 鈥渞efresh鈥 of the government鈥檚 2019 teacher recruitment and retention strategy is 鈥渨orking at pace鈥, Hinds told MPs, but there is no specific date for its publication. Ironically, the strategy was launched when Hinds was education secretary, and he is now tasked with completing a review of its contents. He said this was 鈥減rogressing at pace, as they say, but it鈥檚 also really important we get it right鈥. 鈥淲e鈥檝e got the extant recruitment and retention strategy 2019. We always said we would come back to it and refresh it and we will, and we鈥檙e working through that process now.鈥 6. Maths target not reduced to make DfE look good Just half of secondary teacher recruitment target met Last week, it emerged the government had recruited Targets were also missed by around two fifths last year, including in maths, despite the DfE having reduced its target in the subject by 760. The target was then increased by 920 this year, and missed by 37 per cent. Hinds was quizzed today on why the target was reduced. He said the model was 鈥渃omplex鈥 and that the DfE was 鈥渢rying to recruit more maths teachers鈥. Pressed on whether the reduction in last year鈥檚 target was an attempt to make sure the government 鈥渕issed the target by less鈥, Hinds said: 鈥淣o. The model is not there to be a consumer-facing thing, it鈥檚 there to guide where we are really concentrating effort and resources and incentives.鈥