红桃影视

The theme for is 鈥楾ime for Change: Action Not Words鈥�. While it鈥檚 great to have an opportunity to challenge historical injustice and oppression, we need to do this in the present also. And where better to start than to rethink our hair policies?

already state that policies must not be discriminatory. But in response to the Sewell report, the government said in March this year that it would create new guidance for school leaders about hair policies to prevent discrimination. Meanwhile, the this month.

I could write a book on what my daughter, Ruby, has experienced. She was repeatedly sent home for her hair. Her year 11 picture was replaced by a year 7 picture of her with straightened hair in her yearbook. Her education suffered, as did her mental health. Eventually, legal action with the support of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission saw her compensated and the school signed a legally binding commitment to change their policy.

Ruby in 2020 to ensure other children were spared the humiliation and upset she felt, and I am committed to securing the legacy of her pain. I do this as a parent, a white ally, a teacher and researcher. To achieve this, we need the help of school leaders across the country, and we do not need to wait for new guidance, a change in the law, or for another family to experience this injustice.

Afro hair is a racial signifier. As such, it is by the Equality Act 2010. But the updated this July urges the government to explicitly specify Afro hair as a protected characteristic because stories like Ruby鈥檚 (and 鈥檚 just a few weeks ago) continue to cause harm, to pupils and to schools鈥� reputations.

School leaders can choose to get ahead of this issue now and examine their hair policies with fresh eyes 鈥� time perhaps better spent this Black history month than the annual last-minute scramble for resources.  

The was launched two years ago. Why not join all the other schools that have signed up? Others have scrapped their hair policies altogether, such as Its headteacher, Julie Richardson, explains that she changed the policy as soon as she was appointed in September 2021.

鈥淚t鈥檚 something that I have always believed was wrong,鈥� she explains. 鈥淗ow can hair in braids or in its natural form be deemed 鈥榚xtreme鈥�?鈥�

Where these punitive hair policies originated from is unclear, but it seems they persist because some school leaders believe they improve behaviour. In fact, the evidence is lacking. At Verulam School, the change has had no impact as far as behaviour for learning is concerned. 鈥淲e have high expectations around uniform,鈥� Richardson adds, 鈥渂ut allowing students to express themselves with hair hasn鈥檛 affected this at all. We鈥檙e enabling students to embrace their unique identity and to be comfortable in their own skin.鈥�

What there is however is plenty of evidence of the effect such discrimination has on young people and their families. My own research at UCL examining parents鈥� experiences is full of examples. One participant shared how the school鈥檚 response to his son鈥檚 low haircut had caused the young man to feel harassed and confused.

Teachers and school leaders were 鈥渃onstantly asking him about his haircut,鈥� which he thought of as completely normal. 鈥淗e thought: [鈥�] my dad looks like that, my friends look like that, Barack Obama looks like that.鈥�

One theme all participants shared was the hurt they felt that their voices weren鈥檛 valued when hair policies were being developed to begin with.

So, if you missed in September, you鈥檝e still got the rest of this month to make a stand. Not that fighting discrimination should be guided by calendar events anyway, but listening to our communities doesn鈥檛 need to wait until the government publishes guidance either.