The government 鈥渋ntends鈥 to drop a requirement that most recruits for its flagship teacher training route, currently run by Teach First, should come from the elite group of Russell Group universities. Instead, Labour wants to focus on recruiting graduates who are 鈥渃ommitted鈥 to teaching for the long term, show market consultation documents seen by Schools Week. It would mark a big shift for the scheme, which has been run by Teach First since it launched in 2003 to recruit 鈥渆xceptional graduates with high academic ability鈥. The charity places recruits in schools in some of the most deprived areas. contract ends next year, with a tender to run the scheme for the next five years, worth up to 拢150 million, due to launch this summer. Documents also show the government wants the new scheme to be 鈥渟upplier neutral鈥 鈥 meaning it is likely to get a new name. Dropping Russell Group requirement Those interested in bidding for the contract were told earlier this year that the Department for Education 鈥渋ntends鈥 to drop a 鈥渃urrent requirement鈥 that most recruits come from Russell Group universities, Schools Week understands. This would 鈥渨iden access鈥, bidders were told, and potentially encourage more candidates to train and teach locally. However, the government plans to maintain the stipulation that most recruits have a 2:1 degree. Teach First has faced criticism for lower retention rates than other teacher training providers. An NFER report in 2023 found its retention rate one year after qualifying was 69 per cent, below the 87 per cent on other routes. But Teach First has a two-year training programme, compared with the one year of other routes, and trainees are placed in disadvantaged schools in which retention rates are lower. Teach First supporters also point out many alumni deliver wider impact by moving to high-profile roles in the sector 鈥 for instance, setting up their own charities or organisations to improve outcomes for youngsters. Focus on retention However, the government is now considering whether it can incentivise retention, including by linking it to contract payments. It wants the new scheme to find 鈥渆xceptional candidates鈥 鈥渃ommitted鈥 to teaching in poorer areas over the 鈥渓onger term鈥, bidders were told. Lindsay Patience, the co-founder of Flexible Teacher Talent and a Teach First alumnus who taught for 12 years, supported the change, adding: 鈥淧eople who will make a huge impact in the classroom don鈥檛 have to have gone to a Russell Group university.鈥 But others fear the shift could put off top graduates. 鈥淚 became a teacher in the early days with an expectation that I would teach in an under-served community for two years and develop transferable skills,鈥 said one former Teach Firster. 鈥淚 have since spent more than 20 years in education, including 14 as a teacher and leader. I, and many others like me, would not have come into the profession without the invitation that Teach First made.鈥 The shift could also lead to questions over the Teach First鈥檚 higher funding. James Noble-Rogers, the executive director of the Universities’ Council for the Education of Teachers (UCET), said: 鈥淚f Teach First is going to have a role 鈥 then it does need to offer something distinct and add value recruiting people who wouldn鈥檛 have otherwise gone into teaching.鈥 Renaming scheme The scheme鈥檚 name could also change, with the government considering a 鈥渟upplier neutral鈥 identity, despite the Teach First brand being well-established after 23 years and having high recognition rates among graduates. For instance, the charity is placed number 15 on The Times鈥檚 Top 100 Graduate Employers list. It follows similar moves across similar government schemes. Frontline, England鈥檚 largest social work charity, last year announced it was renaming its training programme 鈥 then known as Frontline 鈥 to 鈥淎pproach Social Work鈥. Natasha Porter Unlocked Graduates 鈥 a charity that trained graduates to become prison officers 鈥 did not extend its government contract last year after a disagreement over rebranding. Natasha Porter, the founder and chief executive of Unlocked Graduates and a Teach First alumnus, said previous governments recognised it had 鈥渞epeatedly failed鈥 to get the best graduates into public service roles. 鈥淗aving a brand that is external to government is a key reason why Teach First has gone on to be so successful. 鈥淢ore than 20 years on and Teach First is one of the best known and most valuable brands on campus. It would be bonkers to lose it.鈥 Teach First did not want to comment in relation to the contract. A DfE spokesperson said the contract 鈥渨ill ensure we can continue to recruit more talented people with the potential to be outstanding teachers. We will set out more details in due course.鈥
Abby R 13 July 2025 I’m a Teach First Ambassador. I agree that the requirement for recruits to be graduates of a Russell group university is unnecessary. There will be suitably qualified and committed graduates that attended other institutions. Whilst I left teaching full time after the TF programme, I have gone on to impact education via another route. I am now about to embark on a PhD and hope to have even greater impact in the future. I think retention is a separate matter. Its not about TF or who delivers the programme, it is about workload, work life balance, needless bureaucracy and pay. Fix all of those things and you increase retention. TF are a fantastic organisation to deliver this scheme. It was a life changing moment for me and I think their impact on education is huge.
Hannah 14 July 2025 In the “Focus on retention” section, the quote should say “under-served”, not undeserved. As a previous TF employee, this is a focus of the charity.