红桃影视

Skip to content

Long Read

How schools are cutting through the fog on vaping

Some secondary schools resort to exclusions and toilet bans for pupils caught vaping on the premises
7 min read
|

Secondary schools are resorting to random searches, banning children from toilet blocks and handing out fixed-term exclusions to crack down on vaping.

The Department for Health and Social Care requested this week that schools ensure their policies on vaping are 鈥渞obust鈥 and sanctions to pupils are 鈥減roportionate鈥. 

Data published by earlier this month shows the proportion of 11 to 15-year-olds classed as current e-cigarette users increased to 9 per cent in 2021, up from 6 per cent in 2018.

While the proportion of smokers in the same age group has dropped to 3 per cent, the research also suggests that one in five 15-year-old girls are vapers. 

Headteachers say the number of children vaping at school has increased since premises reopened after Covid.

It is illegal in the UK to sell such products to under-18s. The long-term health effects of vaping are also relatively unknown.

Schools take hard-line approach

At All Saints Catholic College in Kensington, west London, pupils caught vaping on the premises or in uniform are given fixed-term exclusions. 

Paul Walton, the school鈥檚 new deputy head, says it was routine at his previous school to confiscate e-cigarettes from teenagers. 

The issue, according to him, is a school鈥檚 policy not being 鈥渢ough enough鈥 and a perception that vaping 鈥渋sn鈥檛 that serious鈥. 

In the past academic year, All Saints suspended 18 pupils for vaping, although the number declined in the spring and summer terms.

鈥淲e believe this is down to the strong stance we have taken as a school and the message students and families have taken from this,鈥 Walton says. 

At the Richard Challoner School in New Malden, Surrey, three pupils received two-day fixed term exclusions last year after they were caught vaping.

Sean Maher, the school鈥檚 head, says the issue became more acute after children returned from home-learning as they鈥檇 lost 鈥渁n understanding of boundaries and expectations鈥. 

The school鈥檚 views have not budged. 鈥淲e鈥檝e always had a standing rule in our school, if you鈥檙e caught with smoking material then you鈥檙e going to get a fixed-term exclusion. So, for me, that has to be the same for vaping.鈥

Random searches and vape monitors

An absence of blanket guidance on how schools should deal with the issue has resulted in varying approaches.

Andrea O鈥橬eill, the head of Alsager School in Stoke-on-Trent, told parents in May the school would 鈥渃ontinue to do random searches and if we find banned items [such as vapes], we will issue strong sanctions, such as suspension or alternative provision鈥. 

allows authorised school staff to search pupils, even without their consent, where they have 鈥渞easonable grounds for suspecting that the pupil may have a prohibited item鈥. This includes any item banned under school rules.

At one school, where the head wants to remain anonymous, suspensions are saved for the most serious offenders who vape openly in classrooms. 

鈥淚t鈥檚 just unbelievably disrespectful,鈥 they said, adding that it had happened three times in the past school year. 

Those who get caught outside the classroom face lesser sanctions, including confiscation. Last year, the number of vapes that ended up in the head鈥檚 drawer was 鈥渋n the dozens鈥. 

Pupils face ban from toilet blocks

At St Edward鈥檚 College in Liverpool, students found vaping in the toilets face being banned from using the blocks and instead made to use single-use accessible toilets. 

鈥淲e are also investigating fitting vape monitors to the pupil toilets to alert the CCTV any time a vape is used,鈥 Stephen Morris, the school鈥檚 principal, said in a newsletter to parents in January.

鈥淭he CCTV [is then] able to identify which pupil was present therein as they exit the toilet.鈥

This was part of the schools 鈥減ushing back against an outbreak of 鈥榲aping鈥欌 among mostly girls in years 9 to 11.

Nick Potter, a director at alarm specialist The Safety Centre in Lancashire, told Schools Week that the demand from schools has prompted it to look at expanding its range of vape detectors. 

鈥淭he ones who are ringing are saying they鈥檝e got a massive problem with vaping generally in the toilets and it seems to be on the increase,鈥 he says.

But the model the company currently stocks 鈥 Verkada SV11 environmental sensor 鈥 retails at more than 拢1,000. 鈥淲hen you鈥檝e got several lots of toilets where pupils might be smoking, it gets a bit prohibitive in terms of the cost. We鈥檝e sold around ten,鈥 Potter says. 

Vaping bigger issue than smoking鈥

The issue isn鈥檛 confined to toilet blocks, with several school leaders saying that pupils vape on the way into school. 

Maher thinks vaping is now 鈥渕ore of an issue than smoking was or is鈥 because it’s more discreet.

鈥淲hen people smoke, you can immediately tell and it鈥檚 very hard to hide. But if someone鈥檚 vaping, it鈥檚 harder to spot.鈥

Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), says the recent surge in the number of pupils vaping could be down to the introduction of more disposable models, such as Elf Bar and Geek Bar. 

鈥淭here鈥檚 been an explosion in sales of novel, disposable vapes that are quite cheap, easy to get hold of and easier to use. Certainly that seem to be where the growth has been,鈥 says Deborah Arnott, the group鈥檚 chief executive. 

Figures from a YouGov survey for ASH carried out in March this year show that disposable e-cigarettes are now the most used product among young vapers, up from 7 per cent in 2020 to 52 per cent in 2022. 

Because they are smaller and produce less vapour, 鈥渄isposables are easier for kids to hide and use discreetly鈥, she says.

How problematic is it?

Current understanding of the health impact remains unclear. 

Several heads say the relative lack of longitudinal studies makes them worried about potential unknown 鈥渄angers鈥 . 

E-cigarettes are promoted as a smoking cessation tool by the NHS, which advises they are not risk-free, but carry a small fraction of the risk of cigarettes. There is no current evidence to suggest vaping poses a risk to others. 

While schools are duty bound to ban such items, as their sale is prohibited to under-18s, views on whether it disrupts learning also vary. 

鈥淚t鈥檚 not that it鈥檚 disruptive, it鈥檚 that it undermines the school鈥檚 rules,鈥 Walton says. 

Ofsted also sees it as a behavioural issue. During a of Longfield Academy in Darlington, the inspector noted that school records suggested 鈥渙ngoing challenging behaviour鈥 across the school site.

鈥淭hese include vaping, fights between pupils and truancy from lessons,鈥 it said. The school was rated 鈥榠nadequate鈥. 

What does the guidance say?

An email from the Department for Education to heads on Wednesday read: 鈥淰aping is to help people quit smoking and should not be used by people under 18 or non-smokers 鈥 particularly as the long-term harms are unknown. Policies should be robust, and sanctions proportionate.鈥 

The Department of Health and Social Care has asked schools to review their policies, paying particular attention to new guidance from ASH. 

But its perspective is at odds with schools that have already adopted zero-tolerance policies. 

Among other things, the department advises leaders: 鈥淐hildren should not be excluded from school for vaping or smoking, unless it is associated with other disruptive behaviour that justifies this.鈥

Arnott says sending a child home won’t necessarily stop them vaping. 鈥淭he other risk is if you demonise something, you actually glamourise it as well.鈥 

The Department for Education did not respond to a request for comment.

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 鈥淲e are clear that vaping should only be used to help people quit smoking 鈥 vapes should not be used by children, young people or non-smokers.鈥

Share

Explore more on these topics

No Comments

Featured jobs from FE Week jobs / Schools Week jobs

Browse more news