红桃影视

Former senior Ofsted inspectors behind the 鈥渁lternative big listen鈥� last year have launched their own consultation on new inspection plans, fearing the watchdog is asking leaders to “take it or leave it”.

Frank Norris and Colin Richards have created the 鈥渁lternative big consultation鈥� (ABC) to independently gather opinions on plans for new report cards.

The survey, which launches today and closes on April 4, will run alongside Ofsted鈥檚 own official 12-week consultation, which closes on April 28.

It comes a year after the alternative big listen, which ran alongside Ofsted鈥檚 own 鈥渂ig listen鈥�.

Ofsted is proposing a new inspection framework with a new report card model.

It would operate a five-point grading system for schools across nine key areas, plus early years and sixth form where applicable.

Ofsted鈥檚 single-phrase headline grades were abolished last year as part of measures introduced following the suicide of Reading primary school headteacher Ruth Perry.

The watchdog’s plans have prompted concern in the sector. Leaders have questioned how inspectors will judge a greater number of areas without the length of inspections increasing.

There are also fears the scorecard system will make judgments less reliable.

Leaders asked if proposals are ‘fit for purpose’

The alternative big consultation comprises the same questions as the government鈥檚 own consultation on the plans, but also asks respondents if they believe the proposals are 鈥渇it for purpose鈥�.

鈥淲e are disappointed that Ofsted has presented a model of inspection very similar to the previous one and with such a tight deadline that it feels like it鈥檚 a matter of 鈥榯ake it or leave it鈥�,” said Richards.

The watchdog鈥檚 12-week consultation ends on April 28. The watchdog then has about six months to implement its new framework in November, and the lead-in time must include a pilot of the finalised framework.

Asked recently if Ofsted would push back its timeframe should the proposals require change, chief inspector Sir Martyn Oliver said he would 鈥渞espond to what the consultation tells us鈥� and 鈥渨ill not do anything as a fait accompli鈥�.

Richards said the ABC 鈥渨ill also allow respondents to suggest different features of a responsive inspection system, which we will share in the report of our results鈥�.

鈥淥fsted has stated it is willing to be flexible in response to comments made about its proposals,鈥� he said.

鈥淏ut it is largely pursuing a similar approach to what has gone before. Although we believe that Ofsted鈥檚 proposals do not go far enough, we accept that a final decision needs to be made by Ofsted or any successor inspection agency.鈥�

Norris said they hoped Ofsted will collaborate with and listen to the sector as it consults on its reforms.

Balance of power ‘too heavily with Ofsted’

He said he hoped this would 鈥渞edress the balance of power/control which currently rests far too heavily with Ofsted鈥�.

鈥淲e want to show that it is possible to create a system better fit for purpose,鈥� he said.

鈥淗owever, this will take some time and we will need the help of those who inspect and those who are inspected. We will continue our pursuit of a fairer, more trustworthy and respected inspection process.鈥�

Norris encouraged people to engage with the alternative big consultation, and also with the Ofsted consultation.

Last spring, the alternative big listen received thoughts from 1,368 respondents. It revealed widespread dissatisfaction with the watchdog, with nine in 10 deeming it 鈥渘ot fit for purpose鈥�.

The official big listen meanwhile received more than 16,000 responses, making it the largest consultation in Ofsted鈥檚 history.

Richards said the ABL was launched 鈥渂ecause we were not confident Ofsted would report without fear or favour and would most likely try to obfuscate and show themselves off in the best possible light鈥�.

The online survey, which mirrors Ofsted鈥檚 consultation,

It closes on April 4, and organisers say results will be published shortly afterwards.