The government stands accused of reneging on promises of academy transparency after quietly ditching its pledge to publish investigations into trust scandals. Twenty-seven investigation reports have been published since 2012 under a promise to be 鈥渇air and transparent about how public money is spent鈥. But last month the Department for Education published an investigation 鈥渙utcome鈥 report after an eight-year look into the Lilac Sky Schools Trust. Unlike full reports, the had few details, totalling just three pages. Full published reports are normally at least ten pages, with some as many as 30. The DfE updated its publication policy last year. At the time, the Conservative government said there were no major changes for academies. ‘Maxwellisation process’ The Lilac Sky files: CEO accused of paying own firms after standing down But Schools Week has now been told the department had actually 鈥渟hifted from publishing a full investigation report to reporting a summary of the outcomes of an investigation鈥. This 鈥渆nables the investigation team to publish the pertinent information from these reports without an overly protracted鈥 legal process, such as allowing those criticised to provide a response. This rule, known as the Maxwellisation process, has 鈥渉istorically led to significant delay in publishing investigation outcomes鈥, the DfE said. The change also enables the government investigation team to 鈥渟pend more time on its core function of investigating fraud and financial irregularity across the academy trust and further education sectors鈥. But Dr Mary Bousted, the former general secretary of the National Education Union, said: 鈥淧ublishing very little information is not a satisfactory outcome.鈥 鈥淚t鈥檚 incumbent that anyone in receipt of public money is accountable for it. Money should be spent on children鈥檚 education, and where it was misused it really affected quality of education and children鈥檚 education.鈥 Bright Tribe probe unlikely to see light of day Bousted became heavily involved in collating evidence from those affected by the Bright Tribe scandal. Dr Mary Bousted Founded by businessman Michael Dwan, the trust was eight years ago accused of making false claims for hundreds of thousands of pounds for building and maintained government grants, among other issues. An investigation into the trust, now wound up, has still to be published. It is unlikely to see the light of day. The investigation report decision could also put ministers on a collision course with the Public Accounts Committee. Its MPs berated the government in 2019 for not being 鈥渟ufficiently transparent about the results of inquiries into concerns鈥 about financial management and governance of trusts. The results of inquiries should be published within two months of the work being completed, the committee said. DfE plans to publish ‘outcomes’ Leora Cruddas The DfE believes this commitment is met by publishing 鈥渙utcomes鈥. The PAC would not comment. The department also said the new policy aligned better with other government departments, but would not say which. Councils also do not routinely publish investigations into maintained schools. But Leora Cruddas, the chief executive of the Confederation of School Trusts, said publishing findings more speedily needed to 鈥渂e balanced with providing sufficient detail to enable the sector to truly understand any gaps in practice and improve for the future鈥. 鈥淭rusts are guardians of public funds and it is crucial they are well governed and effectively regulated 鈥 and that includes thorough and timely investigation so that if things do go wrong we can learn from them.鈥
Chris Brooksbank 4 December 2024 The Bright Tribe tenure was awful for the pupils and staff at Whitehaven. I have been involved in education in Cumbria for 40+ years and it was the worst I have seen. It has taken years to start to recover. A generation failed. Staff abused and mistreated. Funding syphoned off, fraud widespread. An abject lesson for academisation.