The government has unveiled plans to expand, merge or create new multi-academy trusts in 55 priority areas in a bid to improve under-performing schools. Department for Education (DfE) bosses believe their approach, set out in new , will boost attainment in left-behind towns and counties 鈥 where as many as one in five primaries and secondaries have been ordered to improve by Ofsted. It comes after academies minister Baroness Barran told Schools Week the government will ramp up its use of powers to strip trusts of groups of underperforming academies en-masse. Government officials want leaders to either expand trusts or launch new ones in 鈥渆ducation investment areas鈥 (EIAs), which are said to have the nation鈥檚 weakest Key Stage 2 and GCSE results. The government hopes its approach will ensure 鈥渘o school is left isolated鈥, while also bringing 鈥渟mall vulnerable trusts鈥 into larger groups and allowing organisations鈥 鈥渧iability concerns to be well managed鈥. 鈥淲here possible鈥, trusts should 鈥渟eek to incorporate schools and single-academy trusts [SATs] with less-than-good Ofsted judgments as well as those that are, if not in a high-quality MAT, at risk of becoming isolated鈥. But the department stressed proposals hinging on 鈥渦nplanned incremental growth鈥 were 鈥渁ctively discouraged鈥. The north west The north west has more EIAs than any other region Government bosses want to consolidate existing trusts in Blackpool to tackle high absence and exclusion rates in the area, while also improving inclusion among disadvantaged youngsters. Similar growth plans have been set out for Knowsley, Halton, Manchester, St Helens, Wirral and Tameside to 鈥渞aise standards鈥. Education chiefs hope to reduce the number of SATs or trusts with 鈥渁 small number of academies鈥 in Bolton. They stressed secondary growth applications were sought from organisations 鈥渨ith a track-record鈥 of driving up GSCE results. The DfE said a 鈥減articular focus鈥 needed to be paid to supporting pupils with English as an additional language or special educational needs and disability in Oldham and Rochdale. Proposals for a cross-phase trust will also be considered in Bury. New MATs are wanted for Liverpool, Salford and Sefton. The north east Larger MATs are wanted in Sunderland, as the DfE seeks a reduction in the number of trusts in the area. Trusts are also being urged to expand in Hartlepool and Darlington, which has more 鈥榠nadequate鈥 and 鈥榬equires improvement鈥 schools (seven altogether) than 鈥榦utstanding鈥 ones (four). Officials also believe new trusts could be formed in South Tyneside, Middlesbrough and County Durham, where just over a quarter of disadvantaged pupils achieved a grade 5 or above in Key Stage 4 English and maths. The figure is 20 per cent lower than the average for all youngsters across the EIA. Yorkshire and the Humber It is hoped the disadvantage gap in Doncaster 鈥 where persistent absence, suspension and permanent exclusion rates are all above the national average 鈥 will be closed by 鈥渃onsolidating and strengthening [its] trust landscape鈥. The same is suggested for Bradford, Leeds, North Yorkshire, Rotherham and Wakefield. In Leeds, education chiefs want to 鈥渂uild capacity of both Catholic and Church of England diocesan MATs to accommodate remaining faith schools鈥 in the area. And in North Yorkshire, Scarborough has been identified as a 鈥減riority area to address underperformance and high levels of suspension, permanent exclusion and low attendance鈥. The department鈥檚 vision also involves building 鈥淪END capacity鈥 across Kirklees by growing trusts 鈥渨ith a record of providing a compelling offer for children with special needs within mainstream settings鈥. The West Midlands In Coventry, Dudley and Walsall ministers want existing MATs to grow, and to create “new high-quality鈥 chains. Government bosses want to raise phonics, Key Stage 2 and GCSE attainment and progress levels in Stoke-on-Trent by merging smaller trusts, transferring SATs and converting council-maintained schools. They are also keen to see the three remaining secondaries and 65 local authority-maintained primaries in Sandwell brought 鈥渋nto high-quality and suitable trusts鈥. The East Midlands In Derby, where almost 20 per cent of schools have been rated ‘requires improvement’ or ‘inadequate’, the DfE said it wanted 鈥渉igh-quality鈥 academy groups already operating in the area to expand. The DfE would 鈥渨elcome proposals to create a new, high-quality trust in the area with capacity and expertise to support both primary and secondary schools鈥 over the next two years. Many local authority-maintained sites in Lincolnshire are in rural, 鈥済eographically isolated鈥 areas. The DfE suggested there was the potential for 鈥渆xisting trusts to grow and new ones to be developed within the county鈥. Education chiefs are calling for new primary trusts to be formed in Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire. Four parts of North Northamptonshire – Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough and Rushden 鈥 have been singled out as areas where 鈥渃onsolidation鈥 is particularly needed. Applications for groups eyeing schools in Nottingham 鈥渨ith a record of improving attainment at Key Stage 2 and working with the most vulnerable disadvantaged鈥 children will be welcomed by the DfE. The east of England The same is recommended for Bedford, where 鈥 as of December 31 鈥 16 of 73 state-funded schools either had ratings of 鈥榬equires improvement鈥 or 鈥榠nadequate鈥. But the DfE said it hoped mergers of SATs and smaller trusts will also take place. The government thinks performance could be raised in Cambridgeshire by 鈥済rowing high-quality MATs鈥 or getting others to enter the area. The county鈥檚 Key Stage 2 attainment levels are currently below the England average, while GCSE outcomes are above nationwide norms. Elsewhere in the east of England, three EIAs 鈥 Central Bedfordshire, Luton and Peterborough 鈥 have been listed as locations where the DfE wants new trusts to form. The DfE believes there needs to be a 鈥渇ocus on improving Key Stage 2 outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged pupils, through MAT structures and work across trusts鈥 in Suffolk. In Norfolk, the government thinks MATs could expand or that 鈥渉igh-quality trusts鈥 could be brought into the area to boost schools. The south west The DfE hopes to create 鈥済eographic coherence鈥 in 鈥渇ragmented鈥 parts of Cornwall through mergers and 鈥渢he growth of high-quality MATs鈥. There is said to be 鈥渁 pressing need to raise education standards by consolidating the trust landscape鈥 in Dorset. Ministers also want existing groups of schools to expand across North Somerset, Somerset, South Gloucestershire and Swindon. SEND provision is listed as a 鈥減riority鈥 for Plymouth, as the government notes there is an 鈥渙pportunity to grow specialist trust capacity in the city鈥. The south east The DfE鈥檚 plan for the Isle of Wight 鈥 which has no ‘outstanding’ or ‘inadequate’ schools 鈥 is to encourage successful MATs 鈥渃urrently based on the mainland to expand onto the island and to develop hubs鈥. Documents show its pupil progress and attainment outcomes at Key Stage 2 and GCSE level are below the national average. In East Sussex, where Hastings has been identified as a 鈥減riority area鈥, brand-new MATs are wanted. Large trusts based elsewhere will also be encouraged to move into the region. Meanwhile, government believes Portsmouth is best suited to an approach that will see good trusts grow and the consolidation of MATs 鈥渢o provide options for the city鈥檚 remaining authority-maintained schools鈥. 鈥楪et in touch鈥 says DfE DfE papers say any established MAT, school or group looking to form a new trust or join an existing one trust should contact their local regional director鈥檚 office for a discussion. During these talks the department will be able to provide more information on the opportunities available in each EIA.
Jeff Fair 14 April 2023 It is always said in education that ideas repeat themselves… Reading these proposals – they sound like Local Education Authorities – although they will have no local accountability. And we all know from DfE evidence that governance actually does little to improve standards – but moving weaker pupils out does improve a schools results – although not the overall lifechances of the pupils in the area…