红桃影视

Skip to content

Experts at hand SEND support should be ‘time limited’, says guidance

Government sets out how councils should develop scheme to offer expert support in mainstream schools
4 min read
|

A scheme aimed at providing more external support for pupils with SEND in mainstream schools should see “time limited” support from experts, new government guidance has said.

Town halls must develop an “experts at hand” service that will see health professionals and specialist teachers made available to support SEND pupils in mainstream schools. Government is giving 拢1.8 billion to councils over the next three years, with delivery from September.

The DfE has set out how local area partnerships – made up of councils and local NHS boards – should develop their offer in year 1.

Members of the expert panel to develop national inclusion standards and specialist provision packages have also been announced. Dr Anne Gordon will be the health-co chair alongside the government’s inclusion tsar, Tom Rees.

1. ‘Time limited’ support

New guidance has fleshed out the role of experts at hand, which should include speech and language therapists, occupational therapists education psychologists or trainee education psychologists and specialist teachers from special and AP settings.

Guidance says: “In most cases, support from the experts at hand offer should be time-limited, with the aim of building the skills and confidence of settings so they can effectively support the child or young person independently.”

Different LAs will receive grants depending on their existing workforce capacity. The DfE will look at evidence of shortages, current use within the local systems, and the extent to which expertise targets unmet needs in mainstream provision, as set out in a local SEND reform plan.

2. ‘Highly specific’ one-to-one support

Guidance sets out how experts will support individual pupils, staff members and system-level change.

Councils and health bodies must publish a local offer setting out how these three layers will be supported through experts.

Pupils could be supported through “light touch assessment”, observation and individualised support, as well as in group or whole-class interventions.

Experts can also support transitions and reintegration.

Guidance says that time-limited one-to-one support may be provided, but only where needs are “highly specific or where the geographic isolation of the setting makes group delivery impractical”.

3. Embedding inclusive practice

Experts at hand should also support settings and staff to embed inclusive practice through training and coaching.

They could observe classrooms and give feedback, adapt teaching approaches and curriculum and help develop specialist roles within a school.

At a system level, councils should set up “clear routes to access advice and guidance” such as helplines, drop ins or digital platforms.

4. Expert panel announced

The DfE has also announced all members of the expert panel which will develop national inclusion standards and specialist provision packages.

The standards will be used to embed consistent practice across mainstream settings, while the packages will inform what provision is needed for a pupil accessing an education, health and care plan.

Dr Anne Gordon, a consultant occupational therapist has been announced as the health co-chair of the panel. Tom Rees, the DfE’s inclusion tsar, was announced as the education co-chair in March.

The full panel is:

  • Alison Stewart, Deputy Director of Children鈥檚 Services for theSouth WestLondon Integrated Care Board
  • Professor聽Susana Castro-Kemp, Professor of Inclusion聽at the聽University聽of Birmingham
  • Professor聽Courtenay聽Norbury,聽Vice Dean for Research, Faculty of Brain Sciences and Professor of Developmental Disorders of Language and Communication at University College London
  • Katherine Walsh, Director for Inclusion聽at聽River Learning Trust
  • Ben Bastin,聽Chair of聽Natspec聽and Head of Treloar College
  • Mark Vickers聽MBE, CEO聽of聽Olive Academies
  • James Waller, Headteacher聽at聽Sunningdale School
  • Susan Douglas聽CBE, CEO聽鈥 The Eden Academy Trust聽(to join panel in Autumn聽2026)
  • Dr聽Sue Franklin,聽Principal Educational Psychologist 鈥 London Borough of Lewisham聽(to join panel in Autumn聽2026)
  • Sarah Clarke, Co-chair of the National Network of Parent Carer Forums (NNPCF), and聽Director for the South East region
  • Professor Karen Guldberg, Head of School of Education, University of Birmingham

Share

Explore more on these topics

6 Comments

  1. Interesting concept with the ‘experts at hand’ service. I wonder how quickly they鈥檒l respond to inquiries.

  2. Catherine Loveridge

    This goes back to the recommendations from the Rose report for the use of specialist teachers and were still discussing it ‘ I am a specialist SPLD dyslexia teacher and have only had access to pupils by working privately so they will need to provide ring fenced funding to ensure academies direct the funds appropriately this time. I wonder if they realise the enormous growth in recognition of pupils with learning difficulties currently undiagnosed that will happen if they allow specialist teachers and professionals to go into schools and do observations and assessments . I really hope it actually happens

  3. Nicola Osborne

    Same old same old. I found as a secondary Sendco that what I needed was experts working with children often with highly complex needs that we couldn’t meet. It takes years to train as a salt or an ed pysch and thats because these are entire disciplines. No one will convince me that “training” for any school staff who already have a full time job, will be of any use whatsoever.

  4. Kia Macpherson

    So more advice for existing overstretched staff to implement, rather than any actual help then…

  5. Amanda Bushnell

    If the Department of Education overhauled its teacher training modules UK- wide to equally include all 5 methods of teaching and learning, then all teachers would automatically have the skills and knowledge to be SEND teachers up to a point, and positively help some of the SEND children in their classes by default.

    This would then enable SEND children with more significant needs to access appropriate independent help.

    Why is the Government devising schemes which can deliver no more than a sticking plaster on an open wound, instead of actually stitching up the open wound in its education system?

    It鈥檚 interesting to note that 鈥 Government Provision鈥 specifically mentions 鈥 light touch assessment鈥, observation鈥, 鈥 group or class work鈥 rather than 1 to 1 provision, and 鈥 town hall鈥 funding

  6. Nigel Kerr

    This should always have been the model. My question would be: Will the interventions be properly research informed? If that is the plan, then maybe invite someone from The Education Endowment Foundation to join the group, thereby bringing a voice from an organisation who as a primary role examine the evidence on the efficacy of such interventions.

Featured jobs from FE Week jobs / Schools Week jobs

Browse more news